comments made by the group from observation of my work:

all different cubes in all different environments

materiality

glass cube = curious

groups is variety?

glass changes/cpatures a view

copper on plinth more limited than copper in flowers

jospeh beuys – narrative thru material

glass cube – going on tour, to places important to me

glass cube – reflects back/disappears/enclosure

window frame – all photos

forlorn

why glass separate? two pieces, similar language

are photos the final? with cubes as props?

plinths – one is archiving the other

4 + 4  – grouped so that textures speak to each other

why not on floor – force viewer to get on floor

visceral objects

made to become safe

more interesting on floor – could be freer, contrived on plinths

communication between objects keeps returning

limiting

documentation

screaming to say something then say sssshhhhhh

glass not wearing clothes – draped looks taken apart

work if less of them? or more space between them? difficult to see groups

interesting textures

just glass and one other

photos do same as covering

what is an object trying to say

emitting/admitting

contrived relation

autobiography of cube, of the cubes story

photos all external spaces

size of images? why is one focussed in on? if smaller such as postcard then evokes travel

what is next in the story? (sequence)

up close photo of glass cub most intriguing, object disappears almost – frame

strength

asking you to look in – domestic

photo spacing so viewed together, like stop motion. size of photos evokes cataloguing. what if really tiny (business card size?) what of photos square? make lots more – fill whole wall of photos

glass is an illusion

less is more

if just one it says something

why cubes this size? intentional? – hnadable/human

reliable about a cube, strong form

granite cobbes – cobblestones – history

units – could carry on indefinitely

but not the glass one – absent but present

pieces of materials on the wall

JG – look at object orientated philosophy